Guide Science and Religion: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Science and Religion: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Science and Religion: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) book. Happy reading Science and Religion: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Science and Religion: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Science and Religion: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) Pocket Guide.

Another item in this book is Intelligent Design where the argument put forward is we are very complex as is a lot of things in the universe hence something of extremely high intelligence must have made it. If for example you look it is very complex so you can tell a high intelligence created it. I personally think it is a good point. In the book Thomas says it needs to be studied before we can take it as fact. When the Big Bang happened in the creation of the universe if that had been a little bigger or a little smaller no planets or stars would have been created.

Equally conditions on the earth wouldn't have to change much for us to be wiped out. This is a very interesting book. Jun 16, PolicemanPrawn rated it liked it Shelves: very-short-intros.

Kategorier

This was okay. Gives a basic introduction, covering the meaning of science-religion debates, Galileo, God in nature, Darwin, creationism, and the mind-body problem. The author does appear keen to downplay the conflict between science and religion at every opportunity, This was okay.

How to Be a Know-It-All | The New Yorker

The author does appear keen to downplay the conflict between science and religion at every opportunity, stressing what he calls a more nuanced view. For example, regarding the issue of creationism and evolution being taught in science lessons, he describes it as a political issue about what should be taught in schools.

He says Galileo vs the Church was a political issue about how we explain the world, whether through scripture or experimental methods. Again, true, but the driver of the clash was religious conviction. These are fairly clear examples of conflict caused overwhelmingly for religious purposes; it would be harder to find more clear-cut examples. Oct 29, Elizabeth rated it it was ok. He tended to make sweeping generalizations that seemed to be in many cases his own opinion and not always a true statement. He also took Bible verses out of context, which was very misleading.

So, based on too many biased and questionable statements, I really question the validity of this book. The only good things from this book hence the two stars and not one were the quick overviews of the famous debates along with the people and books named, for further research. View 2 comments.


  • Clean Kill: A Sniper Novel (Kyle Swanson Sniper Novels)?
  • Human As Relational: A Study in Critical Ontology?
  • Implementing Cisco IP Switched Networks (SWITCH) Foundation Learning Guide: Foundation learning for SWITCH 642-813 (Self-Study Guide)!

Apr 09, Nick rated it liked it Shelves: science. The book can perhaps be best summed up in this quotation by the author, Thomas Dixon: "The story of religion and science is not always one of a heroic and open-minded scientist clashing with a reactionary and bigoted church. The bigotry, like the open-mindedness, is shared around on all sides - as are the quest for understanding, the love of truth, the use of rhetoric, and the compromising entanglements with the power of the state. Individuals, ideas and institutions can and have come into conf The book can perhaps be best summed up in this quotation by the author, Thomas Dixon: "The story of religion and science is not always one of a heroic and open-minded scientist clashing with a reactionary and bigoted church.

Individuals, ideas and institutions can and have come into conflict, or been resolved into harmony, in an endless array of different combinations.

Get A Copy

Largely the author avoids most of the tedious and ill-informed polarisations in this area and presents a balanced picture. I did feel that the chapter on 'miracles' was pretty weak and not worthy of inclusion. Also the chapter on brain and consciousness was somewhat lacking.

It's a shame that the book does not bring in aspects from Eastern traditions, like research into states of consciousness and meditation. Enjoyable, balanced and recommended but not flawless. Apr 14, Choong Chiat rated it liked it. This book provides a good, concise and even-handed examination of the philosophical, political and socio-cultural issues behind and beyond the purported conflict of science versus religion.

However, the brevity of this book is both its strength and weakness. While it is true that this book is meant only as "a very short introduction", it perhaps could have explore in greater depth and detail the various issues and questions discussed in it. As it is, the book's treatment of the various issues and This book provides a good, concise and even-handed examination of the philosophical, political and socio-cultural issues behind and beyond the purported conflict of science versus religion. As it is, the book's treatment of the various issues and questions seem to only skim the surface of things.

Also, the book seem to go nowhere towards the end, with its lack of a definite and overall conclusion or argument of any sort for the whole book. On the overall, I would still recommend this book to those who are interested to know more about or gain a new perspective on the purported conflict between science and religion. Jan 12, Bookish Dervish rated it really liked it. I, personally; see no contradiction between science and religion.

Nevertheless some people do see that there should be a reconciliation to avoid contradictions between scripts and scientific truths. I do admit there are some mentioning of Islam, Judaism and Buddhism. Who else thinks that the Thomas Dixon was not totally o I, personally; see no contradiction between science and religion.

Who else thinks that the Thomas Dixon was not totally objective? I do unconditionally believe in Science especially the controversial theory of Evolution I do Also believe in Islam as the true religion of the universe creator all due respect to other religions Mar 29, Michael Cayley rated it really liked it Shelves: religion , science.

A short book largely about science and the more conservative forms of Christianity rather than science and religion in general.

A Very Short Introduction

It covers Galileo's tussles with the Roman Catholic establishment of his day, and the controversies surrounding evolution, with a final chapter on science, mind and soul, and ethics. This last chapter is the best, and very balanced, arguing that scientific approaches to ethics are just as open to challenge as religious ones. I would have liked to see less detail on Gali A short book largely about science and the more conservative forms of Christianity rather than science and religion in general.

pierreducalvet.ca/175059.php I would have liked to see less detail on Galileo and on evolution, and much more discussion of non-Christian religions and of scientists and other who see no conflict between science and their religious faith. But then this is only a very short book. Nov 07, Daniel Wright rated it really liked it Shelves: vsi , history , other-history , religion , general-science , general-religion , science , science-history , science-religion , dingle. Literally the day before reading this book, I went to the book launch for another book, in which the author argues that the problem with 'science and religion' is not the 'science' or the 'religion' but the 'and'.


  1. Samir Okasha, Philosophy of Science: A Very Short Introduction - Matematicamente?
  2. Prions en Chantant: Devotional Songs of the Trouvères.
  3. Contemporary American Playwrights;
  4. Post-industrial Labour Markets: Profiles of North America and Scandinavia (Routledge Studies in the Modern World Economy);
  5. The Ultimate Nordic Pole Walking Book (3rd Edition).
  6. Salems Lot;
  7. Although I read this book more than three years ago, I can't help but look at it through those very helpful lenses. At any rate, Dixon's introduction concisely covers all the major issues in sweeping strokes. I often felt like I wanted him to say much more, but of course there was no wa Literally the day before reading this book, I went to the book launch for another book, in which the author argues that the problem with 'science and religion' is not the 'science' or the 'religion' but the 'and'. I often felt like I wanted him to say much more, but of course there was no way near enough space, so he cannot be blamed for that.

    The main point he rightly hammers home is that the debates are about science and religion, not between them. If anyone wants curing of the conflict delusion, then I enthusiastically recommend this helpful little book to them. May 19, Jennifer Garcia rated it really liked it Recommends it for: Philosophers, scientists, religious.

    I appreciated Dixon's language and unbiased analysis of these two very dense topics 'science' and 'religion'. It contains some very interesting perspectives upon the many layers in the scientific world and those of religions. This book expanded my understanding and view of the scientific community and religion which are in fact not always polar opposites. It's no wonder you cannot talk about one without the other, when it comes to the question of 'origin' there is a great deal of information unk I appreciated Dixon's language and unbiased analysis of these two very dense topics 'science' and 'religion'.

    It's no wonder you cannot talk about one without the other, when it comes to the question of 'origin' there is a great deal of information unknown and waiting to be uncovered. I could see experts at times getting irritated by the middle road Dixon frequently takes. Nonetheless, it's a great book and especially for beginners. May 21, Jeremy Gomez rated it it was amazing.